Monday 10 September 2012

THE SECRET HISTORIES OF BLACK PEOPLE-early Indian subcontinent UPDATE!!

The earliest known culture of the Neolithic times of the Indian subcontinent was the Indus Valley Culture,an   urban civilization best exemplified by Harappa and Mohenjo daro in Sindh along the now extinct Sarasvati river basin.  According to the Mainstream Science the IVC existed as far back as 3500 bc though some estimates go as far back as 9500 bc.
 These 2 towns had numerous kiln fired brick buildings, a water and sewerage system and many large buildings thought to be for the public good such as granaries,colleges and public baths indicating a highly advanced lifestyle similar to Mesopotamia.

Himalayan earthquakes blocked the source of the Sarasvati and the culture died about 1800 bc.









The IVC or Harappan Civilization was dated to roughly 5 kya  and extended to the borders of  contemporary Sumeria,which isn't surprising when the craniometrics are examined. B.K Chatterjee and G.D Kumar identified 18 skeletal remains as Veddoid/Proto Australoid which compared closely to skulls found in Egypt,Palestine,Sumer and other parts of Asia.
 http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=Q9ryY7N...ans&f=false
Fyi,Veddoid,Australoid,Melanasian,Polynesian are simply Mainstream code for African types.
B B Lal ,another respected researcher unequivocally identified the Harappan megaliths and black and red ware as being Nubian in origin. H N Singh says the pottery began in Nubia and spread through Iran and Mesopotamia before reaching India.
It has been found that the Sumerian language is an Austric language spoken by a group of ancient Australoid people found in India, South East Asia and Australia (The Austric Origin of the Sumerian Language, Language Form, vol. 22, no.1-2, Jan.-Dec. 1996.). An examination of ancient Sumerian skulls has further confirmed that the ancient Sumerians indeed belonged to the Australoid race. An evolved branch of the same tribe appears to have established the Indus civilization as well as the Sumerian one after the submergence of their coastal cities.
 http://EzineArticles.com/313482
There exist strong language affinities with the Harappan descendants,the Tamil/Dravidian and W.Africans:
Since then, the idea of kinship between the Dravidian Languages and certain Negro - African languages had become dear to her heart. That is why she began to study in succession the Senegalese-Guinean (or Sudano..Sahelian) languages, Mande (another Sudano - Sahelian family of languages), Bantu (an East African family of languages) comparing them with the Dravidian languages. This is what led her to publish, in 1950, and 1951, in the “Journal de la societe des Africanistes”, Paris, the following two articles in turn: “Dravidian elements in Peul” and “Telegu and the Mande dialects”
Here is expert opinion on the lexical connection of Dravidian languages and Wolof concerning nominals and morphemes.......The origins of this culture circle are part ticularly complex. The prominent feature is its links with the great states which are found on the same latitude throughout Sudan; beside that, there are visible relationships between this group of elements and the ancient eastern civilisations of Arabia, Syria, Mesopotamia and mainly Inda (of ~les Peuples et las Civilisatjons de I’ Afrique’, Paris, 1948).
 http://arutkural.tripod.com/tolcampus/drav-african2.html
 A knowledgeable Tamil scholar Aravanan. Aravaanan (1980) has written extensively on the African and Dravidian relations. He has illustrated that the Africans and Dravidian share many physical similarities including the dolichocephalic indexes (Aravaanan 1980,pp.62-263; Raceand History.com,2006), platyrrhine nasal index (Aravaanan 1980,pp.25-27), stature (31-32) and blood type (Aravaanan 1980,34-35; RaceandHistory.com,2006). Aravaanan (1980,p.40) also presented much evidence for analogous African and Dravidian cultural features including the chipping of incisor teeth and the use of the lost wax process to make bronze works of arts (Aravaanan 1980,p.41).

There are also similarities between the Dravidian and African religions. For example, both groups held a common interest in the cult of the Serpent and believed in a Supreme God, who lived in a place of peace and tranquility ( Thundy, p.87; J.T. Cornelius,"Are Dravidians Dynastic Egyptians", Trans. of the Archaeological Society of South India 1951-1957, pp.90-117; and U.P. Upadhyaya, "Dravidian and Negro-African", International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 5, no.1) .

There are also affinities between the names of many gods including Amun/Amma and Murugan . Murugan the Dravidian god of the mountains parallels a common god in East Africa worshipped by 25 ethnic groups is called Murungu, the god who resides in the mountains
For the reader who hasn't seen Tamils,judge for yourself if there exists any African phenotype. Along with Australoids classified as Aboriginals they've been on the losing end of history ever since the invading Aryans destroyed IVC around 1700bc.

Ancient genetic flow strongly supports the evidence. A study discovered though Indians are related to what is known as the east Eurasian genepool, their clusters 1 ,11,VII,IX,XII AND XIV which spread from the ME originated in Africa.

 http://www.academia.edu/341049/Origin_and_Spread_of_Dravidian_Speakers



So gentle reader,early Arabia,Mesopotamia,Sumeria,Iran and the Indian subcontinent were extensions of Africa.
There are still nearly pure Africoid populations

Chenchu hunter gatherers of Andhra Pradesh



Part 1
 http://karanjazplace.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-secret-histories-of-black-people.html

Further information:
Research is an endless process. The researcher therefore continually searches for data confirming his hypothesis. Upon finding such data diligence demands the data must first be validated by neutral parties-after which it may be accepted in addition to the extant body of knowledge.
Here is the Ethiopian geez scr












Sanskrit /nagari


Incidentally this isn't new information. It was known over a century ago. Sir William Jones discovered the 2 scripts were identical-however it remained hidden in obscure specialist publications known only to an elite few while the public believed Africa had now writing and those better informed believed geez was influenced by nagari.


The redoubtable Clyde Winters elaborates: Today Eurocentric scholars teach that theIndians taught writing to the Ethiopians, yet the name Nagari for Sanskritbetrays the Ethiopia origin of this form of writing. Moreover, it is interesting to note that Sanskrit vowels: a,aa,',I,u,e,o, virama etc., are in the same order as Geez.



The Indian Ethiopians called Naga, made one important improvement over the Ethiopic alphabetic scripts. This improvement was the addition of vowels to the alphabet.

The major contribution to the Ethiopian Nagas was the Indian writing system called Deva-Nagari. Nagari is the name for the Sanskrit writing system. Over a hundred years ago Sir William Jones, pointed out that Ge'ez and Sanskrit writing are one and the same. He explained that this was supported by the fact that both writing systems went from left to right, Sanskrit and Ge'ez share udentical vowels in the same order, and the vowels were annexed to the consonants.
http://bafsudralam.blogspot.com/2009/01/geez-origin-of-devanagari-writing-of.html

Also fresh  evidence of the African roots of Tamil language has been found.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWyAYGlFZjk

The uploader ,himself a Tamil proves numerous similarities between bantu speaking Cameroonians and Tamil.

India has 2 great national epics the Ramayana and Mahabharata. These ancient Sanskrit tales are part adventure story/philosophical and moral treatises told through protagonists involved in war,love and all the endeavours of the human condition. These genuinely fascinating chronicles are packed with high technology about test tube babies,aircraft, scalar interferometry,mass temperature inversion and what appear to be accounts of nuclear warfare.
 The hero of the Mahabharata,Krishna,worshiped as the supreme personality  of godhead by Hindus,a powerful incarnation of Vishnu  was a real life historical figure thought to have been born roughly 3100 bc.
He was leader,lover,philosopher,protector and friend of all. His statue is a faithful rendition of India's population at this time.

 Obviously he was of the Indian Africoid population,the original inhabitants of the subcontinent. Many say the Mahabharata is also the tale of a real race war wherein Krishna protected his fellow Africoids from the invading Caucasoids.

There may be  element of truth in this theory but given the immense age of Dwarka,known as the home of his Yadav clan thought to have been first built at least 50,000 years ago and to have previously sunk 5 times,he could've been nothing but a black African.




His name means 'black' though many say his true colour is blue!









The sunken city of Dwarka lies just off the beach in the bay of Khambatta in Gujarat state.





The page will be updated as and when any new data is confirmed.



3 comments:

  1. Do also check studies that show a close and definite relationship between old tamil (an austric language) and Sumerian at http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?73104-Sample-of-Sumerian-Sentences-Similar-to-Old-Tamil

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hope you have also seen this http://asiapacificuniverse.com/pkm/sumer.htm All these studies clearly show that Sumerian is an old Austric language similar to Archaic tamil. Anthropological evidence clearly backs this as described in my ezine article that you have quoted.. Despite this because European linguistic Historians have so long claimed Sumerian to be a linguistic isolate, they feel embarrassed to admit that now. However, the evidence is crystal clear now when the results of these two references are seen together.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Ashok! Sorry for the delay. I've been offline for a week.The apricity is unfortunately a hangout for racists shouting their halfbaked theories to impress like minded individuals;the net is full of such sites,so l only spent a few hours on the site when I discovered it last year. It gets tedious seeing Indo Aryans,Indo Aryans,Caucasoids and Eurasians lumped together with faulty categorisations and high school reasoning.
    APU is a good site and further invalidates what Euros have been saying for years. For more on early black NE Asia go go here:http://karanjazplace.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-secret-histories-of-black-people_22.html.
    Not as good as APU but solid supporting evidence showing there was a continuous band of settlement across Asia of the same Africoids.
    Btw,a question about Lord Krishna-my research leads me to believe the early Vedic tales in the Mahabharat and the Vedas were based on historical fact. I've noticed the earliest statues show him black in colour with African hair. Could he have been one of the earliest OOA migrants of the Australoid type now seen among the Kolari and/or Goonds?

    ReplyDelete